Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2025-08-18

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out()

From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2025-08-11 09:25:23
Also in: bpf


On 11.08.25 03:54, D. Wythe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:57:31PM +0200, Alexandra Winter wrote:
quoted

On 31.07.25 10:42, D. Wythe wrote:
quoted
BPF CI testing report a UAF issue:
[..]

As this is a problem fix, you could send it directly to 'net'
instead of including it to this series.
Hi Alexandra,

Yes, it should be sent to net. But the problem is that if I don't carry
this patch, the BPF CI test will always crash. Maybe I should send a
copy to both net and bpf-next? Do you have any suggestions?

Best wishes,
D. Wythe
I do not have any experience with bpf-next. But typically patches
to 'net' are taken after one or two days, if there are no issues.
I'd assume they are then picked to net-next and bpf-next(?) almost instantly.
Then you would not need it in your bpf series anymore.

Sending a patch to two different mailing lists in parallel sounds like
a bad idea to me.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help