Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out()
From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2025-08-11 09:25:23
Also in:
bpf
From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2025-08-11 09:25:23
Also in:
bpf
On 11.08.25 03:54, D. Wythe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:57:31PM +0200, Alexandra Winter wrote:quoted
On 31.07.25 10:42, D. Wythe wrote:quoted
BPF CI testing report a UAF issue:[..] As this is a problem fix, you could send it directly to 'net' instead of including it to this series.Hi Alexandra, Yes, it should be sent to net. But the problem is that if I don't carry this patch, the BPF CI test will always crash. Maybe I should send a copy to both net and bpf-next? Do you have any suggestions? Best wishes, D. Wythe
I do not have any experience with bpf-next. But typically patches to 'net' are taken after one or two days, if there are no issues. I'd assume they are then picked to net-next and bpf-next(?) almost instantly. Then you would not need it in your bpf series anymore. Sending a patch to two different mailing lists in parallel sounds like a bad idea to me.