Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting.
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Date: 2025-08-13 07:11:42
Also in:
cgroups, linux-mm, mptcp
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 05:58:30PM +0000, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
Some protocols (e.g., TCP, UDP) implement memory accounting for socket buffers and charge memory to per-protocol global counters pointed to by sk->sk_proto->memory_allocated. When running under a non-root cgroup, this memory is also charged to the memcg as "sock" in memory.stat. Even when a memcg controls memory usage, sockets of such protocols are still subject to global limits (e.g., /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_mem). This makes it difficult to accurately estimate and configure appropriate global limits, especially in multi-tenant environments. If all workloads were guaranteed to be controlled under memcg, the issue could be worked around by setting tcp_mem[0~2] to UINT_MAX. In reality, this assumption does not always hold, and processes that belong to the root cgroup or opt out of memcg can consume memory up to the global limit, becoming a noisy neighbour.
Processes running in root memcg (I am not sure what does 'opt out of memcg means') means admin has intentionally allowed scenarios where noisy neighbour situation can happen, so I am not really following your argument here.
Let's decouple memcg from the global per-protocol memory accounting if it has a finite memory.max (!= "max").
Why decouple only for some? (Also if you really want to check memcg limits, you need to check limits for all ancestors and not just the given memcg). Why not start with just two global options (maybe start with boot parameter)? Option 1: Existing behavior where memcg and global TCP accounting are coupled. Option 2: Completely decouple memcg and global TCP accounting i.e. use mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled to either do global TCP accounting or memcg accounting. Keep the option 1 default. I assume you want third option where a mix of these options can happen i.e. some sockets are only accounted to a memcg and some are accounted to both memcg and global TCP. I would recommend to make that a followup patch series. Keep this series simple and non-controversial.