Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 3 authors, 2025-09-03

Re: [PATCH 0/9] net: bridge: reduce multicast checks in fast path

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Date: 2025-08-29 16:23:31
Also in: bridge, lkml

On 8/29/25 18:47, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 10:53:41 +0200 Linus Lüssing wrote:
quoted
This patchset introduces new state variables to combine and reduce the
number of checks we would otherwise perform on every multicast packet
in fast/data path.
   
The second reason for introducing these new, internal multicast active
variables is to later propagate a safety mechanism which was introduced
in b00589af3b04 ("bridge: disable snooping if there is no querier") to
switchdev/DSA, too. That is to notify switchdev/DSA if multicast
snooping can safely be applied without potential packet loss.
Please leave the git-generated diff stat in the cover letter.
Please include tree designation in the subject, per:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html

I'll leave the real review to the experts but this series appears
to make kselftests unhappy:
just fyi my email wasn't working for 2 days and unfortunately I missed this set
I took a look now on patchwork, I do have comments but it's difficult to reply as
I don't have the emails and have to do it manually to each, so I'd rather wait
for v2.

a few notes for v2:
- please use READ/WRTE_ONCE() for variables that are used without locking
- please make locking symmetric, I saw that br_multicast_open() expects the lock to be already held, while
   __br_multicast_stop() takes it itself
- target net-next
- is the mcast lock really necessary, would atomic ops do for this tracking?
- can you provide the full view somewhere, how would this tracking be used? I fear
   there might still be races.
- please add more details exactly what we save on the fast-path, I know but it'd be nice
   to have it in the commit message as well, all commits just say "reduce checks, save cycles"
   but there are no details what we save

I will try to give more detailed comments in v2.

Thank you,
  Nik
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help