Thread (10 messages) read the whole thread 10 messages, 4 authors, 2025-08-28

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics

From: Romanowski, Rafal <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-28 10:16:35
Also in: intel-wired-lan, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-wired-lan <redacted> On Behalf Of Simon
Horman
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2025 5:52 PM
To: Paul Menzel <redacted>
Cc: Kohei Enju <redacted>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org;
netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L
[off-list ref]; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
[off-list ref]; Andrew Lunn [off-list ref];
David S. Miller [off-list ref]; Eric Dumazet
[off-list ref]; Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]; Paolo Abeni
[off-list ref]; kohei.enju@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and
lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:18:29AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
quoted
Dear Kohei,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 13.08.25 um 09:50 schrieb Kohei Enju:
quoted
Currently ethtool shows lbrx_packets and lbrx_bytes (Good RX
Packets/Octets loopback Count), but doesn't show the TX-side
equivalents (lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes). Add visibility of those
missing statistics by adding them to ethtool statistics.

In addition, the order of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets is not
consistent with non-loopback statistics (rx_packets, rx_bytes).
Therefore, align the order by swapping positions of lbrx_bytes and
lbrx_packets.
quoted
quoted
Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection.

Before:
   # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)"
        rx_packets: 135
        tx_packets: 106
        rx_bytes: 16010
        tx_bytes: 12451
        lbrx_bytes: 1148
        lbrx_packets: 12

After:
   # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)"
        rx_packets: 748
        tx_packets: 304
        rx_bytes: 81513
        tx_bytes: 33698
        lbrx_packets: 97
        lbtx_packets: 109
        lbrx_bytes: 12090
        lbtx_bytes: 12401

Tested-by: Kohei Enju <redacted>
No need to resend, but I believe, you only add a Tested-by: tag, if
the person differs from the author/Signed-off-by: tag.
+1
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <redacted>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
index 773895c663fd..c6defc495f13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
@@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ static const struct igbvf_stats igbvf_gstrings_stats[] = {
  	{ "rx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) },
  	{ "tx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotc, stats.base_gotc) },
  	{ "multicast", IGBVF_STAT(stats.mprc, stats.base_mprc) },
-	{ "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) },
  	{ "lbrx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gprlbc, stats.base_gprlbc) },
+	{ "lbtx_packets", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gptlbc, stats.base_gptlbc) },
+	{ "lbrx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorlbc, stats.base_gorlbc) },
+	{ "lbtx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotlbc, stats.base_gotlbc) },
  	{ "tx_restart_queue", IGBVF_STAT(restart_queue, zero_base) },
  	{ "tx_timeout_count", IGBVF_STAT(tx_timeout_count, zero_base) },
  	{ "rx_long_byte_count", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc)
},
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <redacted>
Also +1

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <redacted>

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help