Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ethernet: eswin: Add eic7700 ethernet driver
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2025-08-27 12:37:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2025-08-27 12:37:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
+/**
+ * eic7700_apply_delay - Update TX or RX delay bits in delay parameter value.
+ * @delay_ps: Delay in picoseconds (capped at 12.7ns).
+ * @reg: Pointer to register value to modify.
+ * @is_rx: True for RX delay (bits 30:24), false for TX delay (bits 14:8).
+ *
+ * Converts delay to 0.1ns units, caps at 0x7F, and sets appropriate bits.
+ * Only RX or TX bits are updated; other bits remain unchanged.
+ */
+static inline void eic7700_apply_delay(u32 delay_ps, u32 *reg, bool is_rx)
+{
+ if (!reg)
+ return;
+Please don't use inline functions in .c files. Leave the compile to decide.
+ /* Read rx-internal-delay-ps and update rx_clk delay */
+ if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ "rx-internal-delay-ps",
+ &dwc_priv->rx_delay_ps)) {
+ eic7700_apply_delay(dwc_priv->rx_delay_ps,
+ ð_dly_param, true);
+ } else {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "can't get rx-internal-delay-ps\n");
+ }
+
+ /* Read tx-internal-delay-ps and update tx_clk delay */
+ if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ "tx-internal-delay-ps",
+ &dwc_priv->tx_delay_ps)) {
+ eic7700_apply_delay(dwc_priv->tx_delay_ps,
+ ð_dly_param, false);
Given this code, why does eic7700_apply_delay() test for reg? Don't
use defensive code, read your own code and make sure it cannot happen.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr