On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 8:40 PM Menglong Dong [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Some functions is recursive for the kprobe_multi and impact the benchmark
results. So just skip them.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <redacted>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
index d24baf244d1f..9da9da51b132 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.c
@@ -559,6 +559,22 @@ static bool skip_entry(char *name)
if (!strncmp(name, "__ftrace_invalid_address__",
sizeof("__ftrace_invalid_address__") - 1))
return true;
+
+ if (!strcmp(name, "migrate_disable"))
+ return true;
+ if (!strcmp(name, "migrate_enable"))
+ return true;
+ if (!strcmp(name, "rcu_read_unlock_strict"))
+ return true;
+ if (!strcmp(name, "preempt_count_add"))
+ return true;
+ if (!strcmp(name, "preempt_count_sub"))
+ return true;
+ if (!strcmp(name, "__rcu_read_lock"))
+ return true;
+ if (!strcmp(name, "__rcu_read_unlock"))
+ return true;
+
static const char *trace_blacklist[] = {
"migrate_disable",
"migrate_enable",
...
};
it's not like it's one or two functions where copy-pasting strcmp might be fine
pw-bot: cr
return false;
}
--
2.50.1