Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net: phy: dp83td510: add MSE interface support for 10BASE-T1L
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2025-08-20 12:26:32
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 02:11:57PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
The doc in patch 1 says : > + * Link-wide mode: > + * - Some PHYs only expose a link-wide aggregate MSE, or cannot map their > + * measurement to a specific channel/pair (e.g. 100BASE-TX when MDI/MDI-X > + * resolution is unknown). In that case, callers must use the LINK selector. The way I understand that is that PHYs will report either channel-specific values or link-wide values. Is that correct or are both valid ? In BaseT1 this is the same thing, but maybe for consistency, we should report either channel values or link-wide values ?for 100Base-T1 the LINK and channel-A selectors are effectively the same, since the PHY only has a single channel. In this case both are valid, and the driver will return the same answer for either request. I decided to expose both for consistency: - on one side, the driver already reports pair_A information for the cable test, so it makes sense to allow channel-A here as well; - on the other side, if a caller such as a generic link-status/health request asks for LINK, we can also provide that without special casing. So the driver just answers what it can. For this PHY, LINK and channel-A map to the same hardware register, and all other selectors return -EOPNOTSUPP.The document you referenced explicitly says it is for 100BASE-T1. Are there other Open Alliance documents which extend the concept to -T2 and -T4 links? Do you have access to -T2 or -T4 PHYs which implement the concept for multiple pairs?
So far I know, following T2/T4 PHYs support MSE: LAN8830, KSZ9131, LAN8831, LAN8840, LAN8841 DP83826*, DP83640, DP83867*, DP83869HM I have access at least to LAN8841.
I think it is good you are thinking about the API, how it could work with -T2 and -T4, but do we need this complexity now?
Hm.. I just fear to make same mistake as I did with SQI. So, I analyzed as many datasheets as possible. -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |