Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 7 authors, 2025-08-15

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] net: rnpgbe: Add build support for rnpgbe

From: Yibo Dong <dong100@mucse.com>
Date: 2025-08-13 06:45:43
Also in: linux-doc, lkml

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 09:48:07PM +0530, Anwar, Md Danish wrote:
On 8/12/2025 3:09 PM, Dong Yibo wrote:
quoted
Add build options and doc for mucse.
Initialize pci device access for MUCSE devices.

Signed-off-by: Dong Yibo <dong100@mucse.com>
---
 .../device_drivers/ethernet/index.rst         |   1 +
 .../device_drivers/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe.rst  |  21 +++
 MAINTAINERS                                   |   8 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/Kconfig                  |   1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/Makefile                 |   1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/Kconfig            |  34 ++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/Makefile           |   7 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/Makefile    |   8 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe.h    |  25 +++
 .../net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c   | 161 ++++++++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 267 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe.rst
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe.h
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c
[ ... ]
quoted
+ **/
+static int __init rnpgbe_init_module(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = pci_register_driver(&rnpgbe_driver);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
Unnecessary code - can be simplified to just `return
pci_register_driver(&rnpgbe_driver);`
Yes, but if I add some new codes which need some free after
pci_register_driver failed, the new patch will be like this:

-return pci_register_driver(&rnpgbe_driver);
+int ret:
+wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(rnpgbe_driver_name);
+ret = pci_register_driver(&rnpgbe_driver);
+if (ret) {
+	destroy_workqueue(wq);
+	return ret;
+}
+return 0;

Is this ok? Maybe not good to delete code for adding new feature?
This is what Andrew suggested not to do.
quoted
+
+module_init(rnpgbe_init_module);
+
+/**
+ * rnpgbe_exit_module - Driver remove routine
+ *
+ * rnpgbe_exit_module is called when driver is removed
+ **/
+static void __exit rnpgbe_exit_module(void)
+{
+	pci_unregister_driver(&rnpgbe_driver);
+}
+
+module_exit(rnpgbe_exit_module);
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, rnpgbe_pci_tbl);
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Mucse Corporation, [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mucse(R) 1 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar
Thanks for your feedback.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help