Re: [PATCH iproute2] bridge:fdb: Protocol field in bridge fdb
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: 2025-08-16 16:20:57
Also in:
bridge
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 03:11:45 +0000 Mrinmoy Ghosh [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h index 085bb139..1ff9dbee 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ enum { #define RTPROT_OSPF 188 /* OSPF Routes */ #define RTPROT_RIP 189 /* RIP Routes */ #define RTPROT_EIGRP 192 /* EIGRP Routes */ +#define RTPROT_HW 193 /* HW Generated Routes */ /* rtm_scopediff --git a/lib/rt_names.c b/lib/rt_names.c index 7dc194b1..b9bc1b50 100644 --- a/lib/rt_names.c +++ b/lib/rt_names.c@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static char *rtnl_rtprot_tab[256] = { [RTPROT_OSPF] = "ospf", [RTPROT_RIP] = "rip", [RTPROT_EIGRP] = "eigrp", + [RTPROT_HW] = "hw", }; struct tabhash {
This is iproute2-next material. Where is the kernel patch for this? Iproute headers are synced from kernel headers. If you add new RTPROT entry also need new line into etc/iproute2/rt_protos