On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 12:18 AM Johannes Berg
[off-list ref] wrote:

Maybe so, but it really looks like a bandaid?! Why are we trying to
remove it twice in the first place?

Thanks, Johannes. I agree this patch is only defensive and does not
address the root cause.

I am currently tracing the sta_info_destroy flow to determine whether
this is caused by a duplicate free or an unsynchronized access to
sta->debugfs_dir. If the race is confirmed, I will follow up with a
more complete fix that properly handles the lifecycle.