Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2025-08-08

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/18] x86,bpf: add bpf_global_caller for global trampoline

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-15 02:25:36
Also in: bpf, lkml

On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 5:17 AM Menglong Dong [off-list ref] wrote:
+static __always_inline void
+do_origin_call(unsigned long *args, unsigned long *ip, int nr_args)
+{
+       /* Following code will be optimized by the compiler, as nr_args
+        * is a const, and there will be no condition here.
+        */
+       if (nr_args == 0) {
+               asm volatile(
+                       RESTORE_ORIGIN_0 CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                       "movq %%rax, %0\n"
+                       : "=m"(args[nr_args]), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+                       : [args]"r"(args), [thunk_target]"r"(*ip)
+                       :
+               );
+       } else if (nr_args == 1) {
+               asm volatile(
+                       RESTORE_ORIGIN_1 CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                       "movq %%rax, %0\n"
+                       : "=m"(args[nr_args]), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+                       : [args]"r"(args), [thunk_target]"r"(*ip)
+                       : "rdi"
+               );
+       } else if (nr_args == 2) {
+               asm volatile(
+                       RESTORE_ORIGIN_2 CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                       "movq %%rax, %0\n"
+                       : "=m"(args[nr_args]), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+                       : [args]"r"(args), [thunk_target]"r"(*ip)
+                       : "rdi", "rsi"
+               );
+       } else if (nr_args == 3) {
+               asm volatile(
+                       RESTORE_ORIGIN_3 CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                       "movq %%rax, %0\n"
+                       : "=m"(args[nr_args]), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+                       : [args]"r"(args), [thunk_target]"r"(*ip)
+                       : "rdi", "rsi", "rdx"
+               );
+       } else if (nr_args == 4) {
+               asm volatile(
+                       RESTORE_ORIGIN_4 CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                       "movq %%rax, %0\n"
+                       : "=m"(args[nr_args]), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+                       : [args]"r"(args), [thunk_target]"r"(*ip)
+                       : "rdi", "rsi", "rdx", "rcx"
+               );
+       } else if (nr_args == 5) {
+               asm volatile(
+                       RESTORE_ORIGIN_5 CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                       "movq %%rax, %0\n"
+                       : "=m"(args[nr_args]), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+                       : [args]"r"(args), [thunk_target]"r"(*ip)
+                       : "rdi", "rsi", "rdx", "rcx", "r8"
+               );
+       } else if (nr_args == 6) {
+               asm volatile(
+                       RESTORE_ORIGIN_6 CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                       "movq %%rax, %0\n"
+                       : "=m"(args[nr_args]), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+                       : [args]"r"(args), [thunk_target]"r"(*ip)
+                       : "rdi", "rsi", "rdx", "rcx", "r8", "r9"
+               );
+       }
+}
What is the performance difference between 0-6 variants?
I would think save/restore of regs shouldn't be that expensive.
bpf trampoline saves only what's necessary because it can do
this micro optimization, but for this one, I think, doing
_one_ global trampoline that covers all cases will simplify the code
a lot, but please benchmark the difference to understand
the trade-off.

The major simplification will be due to skipping nr_args.
There won't be a need to do btf model and count the args.
Just do one trampoline for them all.

Also funcs with 7+ arguments need to be thought through
from the start.
I think it's ok trade-off if we allow global trampoline
to be safe to attach to a function with 7+ args (and
it will not mess with the stack), but bpf prog can only
access up to 6 args. The kfuncs to access arg 7 might be
more complex and slower. It's ok trade off.
+
+static __always_inline notrace void
+run_tramp_prog(struct kfunc_md_tramp_prog *tramp_prog,
+              struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx, unsigned long *args)
+{
+       struct bpf_prog *prog;
+       u64 start_time;
+
+       while (tramp_prog) {
+               prog = tramp_prog->prog;
+               run_ctx->bpf_cookie = tramp_prog->cookie;
+               start_time = bpf_gtramp_enter(prog, run_ctx);
+
+               if (likely(start_time)) {
+                       asm volatile(
+                               CALL_NOSPEC "\n"
+                               : : [thunk_target]"r"(prog->bpf_func), [args]"D"(args)
+                       );
Why this cannot be "call *(prog->bpf_func)" ?
+               }
+
+               bpf_gtramp_exit(prog, start_time, run_ctx);
+               tramp_prog = tramp_prog->next;
+       }
+}
+
+static __always_inline notrace int
+bpf_global_caller_run(unsigned long *args, unsigned long *ip, int nr_args)
Pls share top 10 from "perf report" while running the bench.
I'm curious about what's hot.
Last time I benchmarked fentry/fexit migrate_disable/enable were
one the hottest functions. I suspect it's the case here as well.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help