Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] vsock/virtio: Move length check to callers of virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put()
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-07-13 21:26:14
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 06:28:37PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 05:45:02PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() only calls skb_put() if the length in the packet header is not zero even though skb_put() handles this case gracefully. Remove the functionally redundant check from virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() and, on the assumption that this is a worthwhile optimisation for handling credit messages, augment the existing length checks in virtio_transport_rx_work() to elide the call for zero-length payloads. Note that the vhost code already has similar logic in vhost_vsock_alloc_skb(). Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> --- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 4 +--- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h index 36fb3edfa403..eb6980aa19fd 100644 --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h@@ -52,9 +52,7 @@ static inline void virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(struct sk_buff *skb)u32 len; len = le32_to_cpu(virtio_vsock_hdr(skb)->len); - - if (len > 0) - skb_put(skb, len); + skb_put(skb, len);Since the caller is supposed to check the len, can we just pass it as parameter? So we can avoid the `le32_to_cpu(virtio_vsock_hdr(skb)->len)` here.
Sure, I'll do that. It means that virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() will briefly be a simple wrapper around skb_put() but once the non-linear handling comes in then it becomes useful again. Will