Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: fix received length check in big packets
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-07-07 03:49:22
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 11:48 AM Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 10:12 PM Bui Quang Minh [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Since commit 4959aebba8c0 ("virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets"), the allocated size for big packets is not MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE anymore but depends on negotiated MTU. The number of allocated frags for big packets is stored in vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags. This commit fixes the received length check corresponding to that change. The current incorrect check can lead to NULL page pointer dereference in the below while loop when erroneous length is received. Fixes: 4959aebba8c0 ("virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets") Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <redacted> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 5d674eb9a0f2..ead1cd2fb8af 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, { struct sk_buff *skb; struct virtio_net_common_hdr *hdr; - unsigned int copy, hdr_len, hdr_padded_len; + unsigned int copy, hdr_len, hdr_padded_len, max_remaining_len; struct page *page_to_free = NULL; int tailroom, shinfo_size; char *p, *hdr_p, *buf;@@ -887,12 +887,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, * tries to receive more than is possible. This is usually * the case of a broken device. */ - if (unlikely(len > MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE)) { + BUG_ON(offset >= PAGE_SIZE); + max_remaining_len = (unsigned int)PAGE_SIZE - offset; + max_remaining_len += vi->big_packets_num_skbfrags * PAGE_SIZE; + if (unlikely(len > max_remaining_len)) { net_dbg_ratelimited("%s: too much data\n", skb->dev->name); dev_kfree_skb(skb); + give_pages(rq, page);Should this be an independent fix?
Btw, the page_to_skb() is really kind of messed up right now that it is used by both big and mergeable. We may need to consider splitting the logic in the future. Thanks
quoted
return NULL; } - BUG_ON(offset >= PAGE_SIZE); + while (len) { unsigned int frag_size = min((unsigned)PAGE_SIZE - offset, len); skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags, page, offset, -- 2.43.0Thanks