Re: [PATCH] nfp: nfp_alloc_bar: Fix double unlock
From: Chen Linxuan <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-01 07:45:24
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 4:12 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:11:04 +0800 WangYuli wrote:quoted
The lock management in the nfp_alloc_bar function is problematic: *1. The function acquires the lock at the beginning: spin_lock_irqsave(&nfp->bar_lock, irqflags). 2. When barnum < 0 and in non-blocking mode, the code jumps to the err_nobar label. However, in this non-blocking path, if barnum < 0, the code releases the lock and calls nfp_wait_for_bar. 3. Inside nfp_wait_for_bar, find_unused_bar_and_lock is called, which holds the lock upon success (indicated by the __release annotation). Consequently, when nfp_wait_for_bar returns successfully, the lock is still held. 4. But at the err_nobar label, the code always executes spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nfp->bar_lock, irqflags). 5. The problem arises when nfp_wait_for_bar successfully finds a BAR: the lock is still held, but if a subsequent reconfigure_bar fails, the code will attempt to unlock it again at err_nobar, leading to a double unlock.I don't understand what you're trying to say. If you think your analysis is correct please provide a more exact execution path with a code listing.
In nfp_alloc_bar(), if - find_matching_bar() fails to find a bar - find_unused_bar_noblock also fails to find a bar - nonblocking == false - nfp_wait_for_bar returns 0 In this situation, when executing nfp_bar_get(nfp, &nfp->bar[barnum]), the code does not hold &nfp->bar_lock. We referred to similar logic in other drivers: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13/source/sound/usb/line6/driver.c#L565 It seems that a lock should be acquired here again.
-- pw-bot: cr