[PATCH v1 net-next 2/7] af_unix: Don't check SOCK_DEAD in unix_stream_read_skb().

From
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Date
2025-07-02 22:36:12
Reply to
Kuniyuki Iwashima, 2025-07-02
unix_stream_read_skb() checks SOCK_DEAD only when the dequeued skb is
OOB skb.

unix_stream_read_skb() is called for a SOCK_STREAM socket in SOCKMAP
when data is sent to it.

The function is invoked via sk_psock_verdict_data_ready(), which is
set to sk->sk_data_ready().

During sendmsg(), we check if the receiver has SOCK_DEAD, so there
is no point in checking it again later in ->read_skb().

Also, unix_read_skb() for SOCK_DGRAM does not have the test either.

Let's remove the SOCK_DEAD test in unix_stream_read_skb().

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 10 ----------
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 1fa232ff4a2e..be4c68876740 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2804,14 +2804,6 @@ static int unix_stream_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor)
 	if (unlikely(skb == READ_ONCE(u->oob_skb))) {
 		bool drop = false;
 
-		unix_state_lock(sk);
-
-		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
-			unix_state_unlock(sk);
-			kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_SOCKET_CLOSE);
-			return -ECONNRESET;
-		}
-
 		spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
 		if (likely(skb == u->oob_skb)) {
 			WRITE_ONCE(u->oob_skb, NULL);
@@ -2819,8 +2811,6 @@ static int unix_stream_read_skb(struct sock *sk, skb_read_actor_t recv_actor)
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
 
-		unix_state_unlock(sk);
-
 		if (drop) {
 			kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_UNIX_SKIP_OOB);
 			return -EAGAIN;
-- 
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 3 authors, last reply 2025-07-09
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help