Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2025-08-08

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] bonding: Extend arp_ip_target format to allow for a list of vlan tags.

From: Hangbin Liu <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-01 07:13:16

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 04:19:22PM +0000, David Wilder wrote:


________________________________________
From: Hangbin Liu <redacted>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 3:18 AM
To: David Wilder
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; jv@jvosburgh.net; pradeeps@linux.vnet.ibm.com; Pradeep Satyanarayana; i.maximets@ovn.org; Adrian Moreno Zapata; Hangbin Liu
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] bonding: Extend arp_ip_target format to allow for a list of vlan tags.
quoted
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:17:13PM -0700, David Wilder wrote:
I have run into issues with the ns_ip6_target feature.  I am unable to get
the existing code to function with vlans. Therefor I am unable to support
A this change for ns_ip6_target.
quoted
Any reason why this is incompatible with ns_ip6_target?
Hi Hangbin

I am unable to get the existing ns_ip6_target code to function when the target
is in a vlan. If the existing code is not working with vlans it makes no
sense to specify the vlan tags.

This is what I think is happening:

In ns_send_all() we have this bit of code:

dst = ip6_route_output(dev_net(bond->dev), NULL, &fl6);
if (dst->error) {
        dst_release(dst);
        /* there's no route to target - try to send arp
         * probe to generate any traffic (arp_validate=0)
         */
        if (bond->params.arp_validate)
               bond_ns_send(slave, &targets[i], &in6addr_any, tags);
               <.......>
               continue;
}

ip6_route_output() is returning an error as there is no neighbor entry for
the target. A ns is then sent with no vlan header. I found that the
multicast ns (with no vlan header) is not passed to the vlan siblings
with the target address so no reply is sent.

The ipv4 code is simmiler but the arp is sent as a brodcast. The broadcast arp
will be propagated to the vlan sibling (in the linux vlan code).

This could be a testing issue,  I am unsure.  Can you help with
a test case with the target in a vlan?
I can reproduce this issue. I guess it's because the IPv6 route code is
different with IPv4. I will check this issue.

Thanks
Hangbin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help