Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 4 authors, 2025-06-05

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] socket: Replace most sock_create() calls with sock_create_kern().

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2025-06-03 04:54:02
Also in: linux-nfs, linux-nvme, linux-rdma, mptcp

On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:52:47PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:09:49 +0200
quoted
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:03:06PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
quoted
I actually tried to to do so as sock_create_user() in the
previous series but was advised to avoid rename as the benefit
against LoC was low.
I can't really parse this.  What is the 'benefit against LoC'?
It was a kind of subjective opinion whether the amount of changes
was worth or not.
So the simple scripted renaming was not worth it.  Maybe I misunderstand,
but based on the reading we should basically have about a handful
callers of the non-__kern variant left.  Or is it a lot more?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help