On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 05:39:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 24/06/2025 16:51, Frank Li wrote:

quoted

quoted

Why imx91 now has 10 clocks?

v6 and this has basic issues. The quality of NXP patches decreases :/

quoted

+        clock-names:
+          items:
+            - const: apb
+            - const: axi
+            - const: nic
+            - const: disp
+            - const: cam
+            - const: lcdif
+            - const: isi
+            - const: csi

No, look at other bindings how they share clock lists.

Sorry, this method is what I suggested. becuase there are pxp between cam
and lcdif, can't use simple minItems/maxItems to limit list.

The point is to put new items, so pxp, at the end.

There are already a list for imx93. If change list order, it will break
ABI. This was rejected at other binding doc review.

Frank

quoted

If put two lists at top, clock-names list have to dupliate at both top and
if-else branch.

If there are better solution, please point me which file have good method
to share two totally difference list.

Best regards,
Krzysztof