On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Danilo Krummrich [off-list ref] wrote:

On 6/18/25 6:45 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:54 PM Tamir Duberstein [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

@Andreas Hindborg could you please have a look for configfs?

@Rafael J. Wysocki @Viresh Kumar could you please have a look for cpufreq?

Thanks Tamir.

Christian, Danilo, David, Greg, Tejun: It would also be nice to get
Acked-by's for your bits. Thanks!

For the whole series and the bits I maintain:

Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>

--

Independent from that, won't this potentially leave us with a lot of warnings
from code that goes through other trees in the upcoming merge window? How do we
deal with that?

I think the idea was to take this during rc so that all trees have it
by the start of the next merge window. I'm not 100% clear on the
kernel mechanics here, but that's my understanding.