Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 4 authors, 2025-06-20

Re: [PATCH v4 12/14] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for netlink_yml_parser.py

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-06-14 17:37:02
Also in: linux-doc, linux-kernel-mentees, lkml

On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:32:35 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
quoted
quoted
@@ -27314,6 +27315,7 @@ M:      Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
 F:     Documentation/netlink/
 F:     Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/intro-specs.rst
 F:     Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/specs.rst
+F:     scripts/lib/netlink_yml_parser.py
 F:     tools/net/ynl/  
With regards to the location itself, as I said earlier, it is up to
Jon and you to decide.

My preference is to have all Python libraries at the entire Kernel
inside scripts/lib (or at some other common location), no matter where
the caller Python command or in-kernel Sphinx extensions are located.
I understand that from the PoV of ease of maintenance of the docs.
Is it fair to say there is a trade off here between ease of maintenance
for docs maintainers and encouraging people to integrate with kernel
docs in novel ways?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help