Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2025-06-12

Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] udp_tunnel: remove rtnl_lock dependency

From: Stanislav Fomichev <hidden>
Date: 2025-06-12 02:47:56
Also in: intel-wired-lan, linux-kselftest, linux-rdma, lkml

On 06/11, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:15:19 -0700 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
quoted
Drivers that are using ops lock and don't depend on RTNL lock
still need to manage it because udp_tunnel's RTNL dependency.
Introduce new udp_tunnel_nic_lock and use it instead of
rtnl_lock. Drop non-UDP_TUNNEL_NIC_INFO_MAY_SLEEP mode from
udp_tunnel infra (udp_tunnel_nic_device_sync_work needs to
grab udp_tunnel_nic_lock mutex and might sleep).
There are multiple entry points to this code, basically each member of
struct udp_tunnel_nic_ops and the netdev notifiers. In this patch only
reset and work are locked. I'm a bit confused as to what is the new
lock protecting :S
I though that most of the callers are from do_setlink and there we have
rtnl and we grab rtnl+lock during the sync. But that doesn't
address the suspend/resume vs do_setlink race, that's true :-(

Did not look deep into the notifiers, assuming they are a way to push
the info down to the devices (under rtnl) plus trigger the sync work,
will take a closer look.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help