On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 22:59:11 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:

quoted

The question is, are we OK with the templates that need to be created
for netlink specs?!   

If there's no other way, one might have a tool for maintainers to use
to update templates, but yeah, having one template per each yaml
is not ideal. I think we need to investigate it better and seek for
some alternatives to avoid it.

FWIW we have tools/net/ynl/ynl-regen.sh, it regenerates the C code 
we have committed in the tree (uAPI headers mostly).
We could add it there. Which is not to distract from your main
point that not having the templates would be ideal.