Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] eth: sfc: falcon: migrate to new RXFH callbacks

From
Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Date
2025-06-16 15:32:28
Also in
imx
Reply to
Jakub Kicinski, 2025-06-13
On 13/06/2025 15:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:44:40 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
quoted
So granted that you're only moving code, but looking at this it doesn't
 actually make sense, since every path that sets info->data to nonzero
 also sets min_revision, so why not just do the ef4_nic_rev() check at
 the start?  Answer, from git log spelunking, is that when this code was
 shared with Siena, EFX_REV_SIENA_A0 supported IPv6 here.
Ack, I was tempted to clean this up, but it felt slightly outside of 
the objective. Looks like I need to respin for enetc - I can change 
it in v2 if you'd like?
I'd say just keep your patch as is, then I'll send a follow-up that does
 the refactor and also adds a comment about why the hashing config is what
 it is.
Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 4 authors, last reply 2025-06-16
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help