Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 4/6] socket: Remove kernel socket conversion except for net/rds/.
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Date: 2025-05-22 16:40:27
Also in:
linux-nfs, linux-nvme, linux-rdma, mptcp
On 5/22/25 4:55 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On 5/17/25 5:50 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:quoted
Since commit 26abe14379f8 ("net: Modify sk_alloc to not reference count the netns of kernel sockets."), TCP kernel socket has caused many UAF. We have converted such sockets to hold netns refcnt, and we have the same pattern in cifs, mptcp, nvme, rds, smc, and sunrpc. __sock_create_kern(..., &sock); sk_net_refcnt_upgrade(sock->sk); Let's drop the conversion and use sock_create_kern() instead. The changes for cifs, mptcp, nvme, and smc are straightforward. For sunrpc, we call sock_create_net() for IPPROTO_TCP only and still call __sock_create_kern() for others. For rds, we cannot drop sk_net_refcnt_upgrade() for accept()ed sockets. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <redacted>This LGTM, but is touching a few other subsystems, it would be great to collect acks from the relevant maintainers: I'm adding a few CCs. Direct link to the series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250517035120.55560-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/#t (local)
Thank you, Paolo, for forwarding this series. For all hunks modifying net/sunrpc/svcsock.c and net/handshake/handshake-test.c: Acked-by: Chuck Lever [off-list ref] Regarding patch 4/6: This paragraph in the patch description needs to explain /why/ sunrpc is an exception:
For sunrpc, we call sock_create_net() for IPPROTO_TCP only and still call __sock_create_kern() for others.
The below hunk doesn't seem related to the marquee purpose of this series. Should it be a separate patch with its own rationale?
@@ -1541,8 +1544,8 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_create_socket(structsvc_serv *serv,
newlen = error;
if (protocol == IPPROTO_TCP) {
- sk_net_refcnt_upgrade(sock->sk);
- if ((error = kernel_listen(sock, 64)) < 0)
+ error = kernel_listen(sock, 64);
+ if (error < 0)
goto bummer;
}
quoted
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/connect.c b/fs/smb/client/connect.c index 37a2ba38f10e..c7b4f5a7cca1 100644 --- a/fs/smb/client/connect.c +++ b/fs/smb/client/connect.c@@ -3348,21 +3348,14 @@ generic_ip_connect(struct TCP_Server_Info *server) socket = server->ssocket; } else { struct net *net = cifs_net_ns(server); - struct sock *sk; - rc = __sock_create_kern(net, sfamily, SOCK_STREAM, - IPPROTO_TCP, &server->ssocket); + rc = sock_create_kern(net, sfamily, SOCK_STREAM, + IPPROTO_TCP, &server->ssocket); if (rc < 0) { cifs_server_dbg(VFS, "Error %d creating socket\n", rc); return rc; } - sk = server->ssocket->sk; - __netns_tracker_free(net, &sk->ns_tracker, false); - sk->sk_net_refcnt = 1; - get_net_track(net, &sk->ns_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); - sock_inuse_add(net, 1);AFAICS the above implicitly adds a missing net_passive_dec(net), which in turns looks like a separate bugfix. What about adding a separate patch introducing that line? Could be in the same series to simplify the processing. Thanks, Paolo
-- Chuck Lever