Thread (49 messages) 49 messages, 3 authors, 2025-05-15

[PATCH v15 22/43] dept: apply timeout consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait

STALE504d

From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Date: 2025-05-13 10:08:00
Also in: dri-devel, linux-block, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, linux-ide, linux-mm, lkml
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

Revision v15 of 12 in this series.

Revisions (12)
  1. v10 [diff vs current]
  2. v10 [diff vs current]
  3. v10 [diff vs current]
  4. v11 [diff vs current]
  5. v12 [diff vs current]
  6. v13 [diff vs current]
  7. v14 [diff vs current]
  8. v15 current
  9. v16 [diff vs current]
  10. v17 [diff vs current]
  11. v18 [diff vs current]
  12. v19 [diff vs current] 
Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the
consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait, assuming an input 'ret' in
___wait_var_event() macro is used as a timeout value.

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
---
 include/linux/wait_bit.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/wait_bit.h b/include/linux/wait_bit.h
index 179a616ad245..9885ac4e1ded 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait_bit.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait_bit.h
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ extern wait_queue_head_t *__var_waitqueue(void *p);
 	struct wait_bit_queue_entry __wbq_entry;			\
 	long __ret = ret; /* explicit shadow */				\
 									\
-	sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL);					\
+	sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, __ret);			\
 	init_wait_var_entry(&__wbq_entry, var,				\
 			    exclusive ? WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE : 0);		\
 	for (;;) {							\
-- 
2.17.1
Other recent patches touching these files
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help