Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 2 authors, 2025-06-01

Re: [PATCH batadv 2/5] batman-adv: only create hardif while a netdev is part of a mesh

From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Date: 2025-05-31 09:16:46
Also in: batman, lkml

On Monday, 19 May 2025 22:46:29 CEST Matthias Schiffer wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -734,9 +768,6 @@ int batadv_hardif_enable_interface(struct batadv_hard_iface *hard_iface,
        if (ret < 0)
                goto err_upper;
 
-       hard_iface->if_status = BATADV_IF_INACTIVE;
-
-       kref_get(&hard_iface->refcount);
        hard_iface->batman_adv_ptype.type = ethertype;
        hard_iface->batman_adv_ptype.func = batadv_batman_skb_recv
This is confusing. You remove the reference for the batman_adv_ptype but kept 
the `batadv_hardif_put(hard_iface);` after 
`dev_remove_pack(&hard_iface->batman_adv_ptype);`.

I think this should be added again and instead following code should receive a 
`batadv_hardif_put(hard_iface);` after the `list_del_rcu(&hard_iface->list);`:

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -818,11 +849,16 @@ void batadv_hardif_disable_interface(struct batadv_hard_iface *hard_iface)
        struct batadv_priv *bat_priv = netdev_priv(hard_iface->mesh_iface);
        struct batadv_hard_iface *primary_if = NULL;
 
+       ASSERT_RTNL();
+
        batadv_hardif_deactivate_interface(hard_iface);
 
        if (hard_iface->if_status != BATADV_IF_INACTIVE)
                goto out;
 
+       list_del_rcu(&hard_iface->list);
+       batadv_hardif_generation++;
+
        batadv_info(hard_iface->mesh_iface, "Removing interface: %s\n",
                    hard_iface->net_dev->name);
        dev_remove_pack(&hard_iface->batman_adv_ptype);

And yes, this means that this needs to be removed in PATCH 3 again - together 
with the `kref_get` from this chunk (from PATCH 3):

On Monday, 19 May 2025 22:46:31 CEST Matthias Schiffer wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -738,8 +735,6 @@ int batadv_hardif_enable_interface(struct net_device *net_dev,
        batadv_v_hardif_init(hard_iface);
 
        kref_get(&hard_iface->refcount);
-       list_add_tail_rcu(&hard_iface->list, &batadv_hardif_list);
-       batadv_hardif_generation++;
 
        hardif_mtu = READ_ONCE(hard_iface->net_dev->mtu);
        required_mtu = READ_ONCE(mesh_iface->mtu) + max_header_len;


Just a question about this part (you don't really need to change it - I am 
just interested). Why did you move this MTU check to such a late position in 
the code?
-       hardif_mtu = READ_ONCE(hard_iface->net_dev->mtu);
-       required_mtu = READ_ONCE(mesh_iface->mtu) + max_header_len;
+       ASSERT_RTNL();
 
-       if (hardif_mtu < ETH_MIN_MTU + max_header_len)
+       if (!batadv_is_valid_iface(net_dev))
                return -EINVAL;
 
[...]
+       hard_iface = kzalloc(sizeof(*hard_iface), GFP_ATOMIC);
+       if (!hard_iface)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       netdev_hold(net_dev, &hard_iface->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
+       hard_iface->net_dev = net_dev;
[...]
+       hardif_mtu = READ_ONCE(hard_iface->net_dev->mtu);
+       required_mtu = READ_ONCE(mesh_iface->mtu) + max_header_len;
+
+       if (hardif_mtu < ETH_MIN_MTU + max_header_len) {
+               ret = -EINVAL;
+               goto err_put;
+       }
It made the error handling more complicated. And at the moment, I don't see 
the reason. For me, It would have been been more logical to just a a minimal 
invasive change like:
-       hardif_mtu = READ_ONCE(hard_iface->net_dev->mtu);
+       hardif_mtu = READ_ONCE(net_dev->mtu);


Thanks,
	Sven

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help