On Wed May 28, 2025 at 12:36 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:

On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 06:29:46PM -0400, Tamir Duberstein wrote:

quoted

On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 11:04 AM Benno Lossin [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sat May 24, 2025 at 10:33 PM CEST, Tamir Duberstein wrote:

quoted

+macro_rules! c_str_avoid_literals {

I don't like this name, how about `concat_to_c_str` or
`concat_with_nul`?

This macro also is useful from macros that have a normal string literal,
but can't turn it into a `c""` one.

Uh, can you give an example? I'm not attached to the name.

I also think it should be renamed. Right now it sounds like it creates a
c string while avoiding literals in the input ... whatever that means.

Yeah that's a good way to put why the name is weird.

I like Benno's suggestions, but str_to_cstr! could also work?

Hmm, I think then people won't know that it can also concat? I don't
think it matters too much, the macro probably won't be used that often
and if someone needs to use it, they probably wouldn't fine it by name
alone.

---
Cheers,
Benno