On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 11:33:06PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
On 08/05/2025 20:48, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
priv->rx_ts_enabled is a boolean variable (0 or 1). Overlapped over enum
hwtstamp_rx_filters, it makes cfg.rx_filter take the value of either
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE (when 0) or HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL (when 1).
Hmm.. I have to disagree here. rx_ts_enabled is int, not bool:
struct cpsw_priv {
struct net_device *ndev;
struct device *dev;
u32 msg_enable;
u8 mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
bool rx_pause;
bool tx_pause;
bool mqprio_hw;
int fifo_bw[CPSW_TC_NUM];
int shp_cfg_speed;
int tx_ts_enabled;
int rx_ts_enabled;
struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
....
And it's assigned a value of HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V2_EVENT in
cpsw_hwtstamp_set(). Not sure this change is actually needed.
You're right, thanks for pointing it out. I had searched for
"rx_ts_enabled" and mistook the first occurrence, in am65-cpsw-nuss.h,
as the definition for this driver. The patch is not needed in that case.