Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2025-05-29

Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] ovpn: ensure sk is still valid during cleanup

flat view

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-05-29 09:44:53

On 5/27/25 3:46 PM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c b/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c
index bea03913bfb1..1dd7e763c168 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ovpn/netlink.c
@@ -423,9 +423,14 @@ int ovpn_nl_peer_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	ovpn_sock = ovpn_socket_new(sock, peer);
 	/* at this point we unconditionally drop the reference to the socket:
 	 * - in case of error, the socket has to be dropped
-	 * - if case of success, the socket is configured and let
+	 * - if case of success, the socket is configured and we let
 	 *   userspace own the reference, so that the latter can
-	 *   trigger the final close()
+	 *   trigger the final close().
+	 *
+	 * NOTE: at this point ovpn_socket_new() has acquired a reference
+	 * to sock->sk. That's needed especially to avoid race conditions
+	 * during cleanup, where sock may still be alive, but sock->sk may be
+	 * getting released concurrently.
This comment duplicate some wording from commit message contents and
don't add much value IMHO. It could be dropped.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -192,19 +189,30 @@ struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_socket_new(struct socket *sock, struct ovpn_peer *peer)
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 
+	/* increase sk refcounter as we'll store a reference in
+	 * ovpn_socket.
+	 * ovpn_socket_release() will decrement the refcounter.
+	 */
+	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt)) {
How could sk_refcnt be zero here? likely just sock_hold() is sufficient.
Also I think the reference could be acquired a little later, avoiding at
least the following chunk.

Also IMHO the comment is not very clear. I think it should state
explicitly which entity is retaining the reference (AFAICS the peer hash
table).

/P
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help