Re: [PATCH] sctp: mark sctp_do_peeloff static
From: Benjamin Poirier <hidden>
Date: 2025-05-26 19:38:37
Also in:
linux-sctp
On 2025-05-26 14:25 -0400, Xin Long wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 1:47 AM Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
sctp_do_peeloff is only used inside of net/sctp/socket.c, so mark it static. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 2 -- net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h index d8da764cf6de..e96d1bd087f6 100644 --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h@@ -364,8 +364,6 @@ sctp_assoc_to_state(const struct sctp_association *asoc) /* Look up the association by its id. */ struct sctp_association *sctp_id2assoc(struct sock *sk, sctp_assoc_t id); -int sctp_do_peeloff(struct sock *sk, sctp_assoc_t id, struct socket **sockp); - /* A macro to walk a list of skbs. */ #define sctp_skb_for_each(pos, head, tmp) \ skb_queue_walk_safe(head, pos, tmp)diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 53725ee7ba06..da048e386476 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c@@ -5627,7 +5627,8 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt_autoclose(struct sock *sk, int len, char __user *optv } /* Helper routine to branch off an association to a new socket. */ -int sctp_do_peeloff(struct sock *sk, sctp_assoc_t id, struct socket **sockp) +static int sctp_do_peeloff(struct sock *sk, sctp_assoc_t id, + struct socket **sockp) { struct sctp_association *asoc = sctp_id2assoc(sk, id); struct sctp_sock *sp = sctp_sk(sk);@@ -5675,7 +5676,6 @@ int sctp_do_peeloff(struct sock *sk, sctp_assoc_t id, struct socket **sockp) return err; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(sctp_do_peeloff);I believe sctp_do_peeloff() was exported specifically to allow usage outside of the core SCTP code. See: commit 0343c5543b1d3ffa08e6716d82afb62648b80eba Author: Benjamin Poirier [off-list ref] Date: Thu Mar 8 05:55:58 2012 +0000 sctp: Export sctp_do_peeloff
Thanks for digging that up. The purpose was of course for the commit that followed: 2f2d76cc3e93 dlm: Do not allocate a fd for peeloff (v3.4-rc1) Since that usage was removed in ee44b4bc054a dlm: use sctp 1-to-1 API (v4.3-rc1) I don't see a problem with marking sctp_do_peeloff() static again.
While there’s no known in-tree usage beyond SCTP itself, we can’t be sure whether this function has been used by out-of-tree kernel modules.
The mainline kernel does not need to cater to out-of-tree users.