Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 6 authors, 2025-05-19

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v3 12/18] openvswitch: Move ovs_frag_data_storage into the struct ovs_pcpu_storage

From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-05-05 12:34:46
Also in: linux-rt-devel

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [off-list ref] writes:
ovs_frag_data_storage is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
this data structure requires explicit locking.

Move ovs_frag_data_storage into the struct ovs_pcpu_storage which already
provides locking for the structure.

Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
Tested it with the same script, and see that it preforms inline with my
unpatched results.  This is without CONFIG_PREEMPT, so I didn't do any
checks on a 'RT' system.  That does make me wonder whether it really is
my system or something in the way local lock is being used, or even a
misunderstanding about the possible contention scenarios.

I also did check the openvswitch userspace kernel test suite and that
also passes.  So looks good that way.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help