On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:26:07AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

+Cc NETWORKING [TLS] maintainers and netdev for input, thanks.

The full error is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/fcfa11c6-2738-4a2e-baa8-09fa8f79cbf3@suse.de/ (local)

On 3/4/25 11:20, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

quoted

On 3/4/25 09:18, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

quoted

On 3/4/25 08:58, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

quoted

On 3/3/25 23:02, Vlastimil Babka wrote:

quoted

Also make sure you have CONFIG_DEBUG_VM please.

Here you go:

[  134.506802] page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000
index:0x0 pfn:0x101ef8
[  134.509253] head: order:3 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0
nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
[  134.511594] flags:
0x17ffffc0000040(head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
[  134.513556] page_type: f5(slab)
[  134.513563] raw: 0017ffffc0000040 ffff888100041b00 ffffea0004a90810
ffff8881000402f0
[  134.513568] raw: 0000000000000000 00000000000a000a 00000000f5000000
0000000000000000
[  134.513572] head: 0017ffffc0000040 ffff888100041b00 ffffea0004a90810
ffff8881000402f0
[  134.513575] head: 0000000000000000 00000000000a000a 00000000f5000000
0000000000000000
[  134.513579] head: 0017ffffc0000003 ffffea000407be01 ffffffffffffffff
0000000000000000
[  134.513583] head: 0000000000000008 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff
0000000000000000
[  134.513585] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(((unsigned int)
folio_ref_count(folio) + 127u <= 127u))
[  134.513615] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  134.529822] kernel BUG at ./include/linux/mm.h:1455!

Yeah, just as I suspected, folio_get() says the refcount is 0.

... and it has a page_type of f5 (slab)

quoted

quoted

quoted

[  134.554509] Call Trace:
[  134.580282]  iov_iter_get_pages2+0x19/0x30

Presumably that's __iov_iter_get_pages_alloc() doing get_page() either in
the " if (iov_iter_is_bvec(i)) " branch or via iter_folioq_get_pages()?

It's the bvec path:

                iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, len);

quoted

quoted

Which doesn't work for a sub-size kmalloc() from a slab folio, which after
the frozen refcount conversion no longer supports get_page().

The question is if this is a mistake specific for this path that's easy to
fix or there are more paths that do this. At the very least the pinning of
page through a kmalloc() allocation from it is useless - the object itself
has to be kfree()'d and that would never happen through a put_page()
reaching zero.

Looks like a specific mistake.
tls_sw is the only user of sk_msg_zerocopy_from_iter()
(which is calling into __iov_iter_get_pages_alloc()).

And, more to the point, tls_sw messes up iov pacing coming in from
the upper layers.
So even if the upper layers send individual iovs (where each iov might
contain different allocation types), tls_sw is packing them together 
into full records. So it might end up with iovs having _different_ 
allocations.
Which would explain why we only see it with TLS, but not with normal
connections.

I thought we'd done all the work needed to get rid of these pointless
refcount bumps.  Turns out that's only on the block side (eg commit
e4cc64657bec).  So what does networking need in order to understand
that some iovecs do not need to mess with the refcount?