Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2025-03-11

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] dt-bindings: net: dwmac: Increase 'maxItems' for 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names'

flat view

From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-03-11 07:17:18
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-renesas-soc, lkml

Hi Rob,

Thank you for the review.

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 9:30 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 08:09:19PM +0000, Prabhakar wrote:
quoted
From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>

Increase the `maxItems` value for the `interrupts` and `interrupt-names`
properties to accommodate the Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC, which features the
`snps,dwmac-5.20` IP with 11 interrupts.

Also add `additionalItems: true` to allow specifying extra interrupts
beyond the predefined ones. Update the `interrupt-names` property to
allow specifying extra `interrupt-names`.

Also refactor the optional `interrupt-names` property by consolidating
repeated enums into a single enum list.

Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
---
Note, for this change I will be sending a sperate patch for vendor
bindings to add constraints.

v1->v2
- No change
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
index 3f0aa46d798e..fad0d611a75c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ properties:

   interrupts:
     minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 11
+    additionalItems: true
     items:
       - description: Combined signal for various interrupt events
       - description: The interrupt to manage the remote wake-up packet detection
@@ -122,11 +124,11 @@ properties:

   interrupt-names:
     minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 11
+    additionalItems: true
     items:
       - const: macirq
       - enum: [eth_wake_irq, eth_lpi, sfty]
-      - enum: [eth_wake_irq, eth_lpi, sfty]
-      - enum: [eth_wake_irq, eth_lpi, sfty]
I think this should be structured similar to the DWC PCIe binding where
we define all possible names, but not the order:

minItems: 1
maxItems: 11
items:
  oneOf:
    - const: macirq
      description: ...
    - const: eth_wake_irq
      description: ...
    - pattern: '^rx-queue-[0-3]$'
      description: ...
    - pattern: '^tx-queue-[0-3]$'
      description: ...

And so on. Move the descriptions from 'interrupts' and drop 'items' and
'additionalItems' from it.
Thanks for the pointer, I'll do as suggested above.

@Russel, are you OK from me to add rx-queue/tx-queue in this binding
file or would you suggest different names for it. Please share your
thoughts.

Cheers,
Prabhakar
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help