Re: request_irq() with local bh disabled
From: Boqun Feng <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-07 23:10:12
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:33:36AM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:57:40AM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 10:39:46PM +0900, Ryo Takakura wrote:quoted
Hi Boris, On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 14:13:19 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 09:58:51PM +0900, Ryo Takakura wrote:quoted
I'm so sorry that the commit caused this problem... Please let me know if there is anything that I should do.It is gone from the tip tree so you can take your time and try to do it right. Peter and/or I could help you reproduce the issue and try to figure out what needs to change there. HTH.Thank you so much for this. I really appreciate it. I'll once again take a look and try to fix the problem.Looks like we missed cases where acquire the lock: netif_addr_lock_bh(): local_bh_disable(); spin_lock_nested(); release the lock: netif_addr_unlock_bh(): spin_unlock_bh(); // <- calling __local_bh_disable_ip() directly means we should do the following on top of your changes. Regards, Boqun ------------------->8diff --git a/include/linux/bottom_half.h b/include/linux/bottom_half.h index 0640a147becd..7553309cbed4 100644 --- a/include/linux/bottom_half.h +++ b/include/linux/bottom_half.h@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ extern struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map; static inline void local_bh_disable(void) { - lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map); __local_bh_disable_ip(_THIS_IP_, SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET); }@@ -31,13 +30,11 @@ extern void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt); static inline void local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip) { - lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map); __local_bh_enable_ip(ip, SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET); } static inline void local_bh_enable(void) { - lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map); __local_bh_enable_ip(_THIS_IP_, SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET); }diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c index e864f9ce1dfe..782d5e9753f6 100644 --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c@@ -175,6 +175,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt) lockdep_softirqs_off(ip); raw_local_irq_restore(flags); } + + lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__local_bh_disable_ip);@@ -183,6 +185,8 @@ static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt, bool unlock) unsigned long flags; int newcnt; + lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map); + DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->softirq_disable_cnt != this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt));@@ -208,6 +212,8 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt) u32 pending; int curcnt; + lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map); +Ok, this is not needed because __local_bh_enable() will be called by __local_bh_enable_ip().Hmm.. it's a bit complicated than that because __local_bh_enable() is called twice. We need to remain the lock_map_release() in __local_bh_enable_ip(), remove the lock_map_release() and add another one in ksoftirq_run_end(). Let me think and test more on this.
So what I have came up so far is as follow:
1. I moved bh_lock_map to only for PREEMPT_RT (since for non-RT we have
current softirq context tracking).
2. I moved lock_map_acquire_read() and lock_map_release() into
PREEMPT_RT version of __local_bh_{disable,enable}_ip().
3. I added a lock_map_release() in ksoftirq_run_end() to release the
conceptual bh_lock_map lock.
Let me know how you think about this. Given 2 & 3 needs some reviews
from PREEMPT_RT, and it's -rc5 already, so I'm going to postpone this
into 6.16 (I will resend this patch if it looks good to you). Sounds
good?
Regards,
Boqun
------------------------------------------------->8
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: Fix wait context check on softirq for PREEMPT_RT
Since commit 0c1d7a2c2d32 ("lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on
PREEMPT_RT."), the wait context test for mutex usage within
"in softirq context" fails as it references @softirq_context.
[ 0.184549] | wait context tests |
[ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.184549] | rcu | raw | spin |mutex |
[ 0.184549] --------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 0.184550] in hardirq context: ok | ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.185083] in hardirq context (not threaded): ok | ok | ok | ok |
[ 0.185606] in softirq context: ok | ok | ok |FAILED|
As a fix, add lockdep map for BH disabled section. This fixes the
issue by letting us catch cases when local_bh_disable() gets called
with preemption disabled where local_lock doesn't get acquired.
In the case of "in softirq context" selftest, local_bh_disable() was
being called with preemption disable as it's early in the boot.
[boqun: Move the lockdep annotations into __local_bh_*() to avoid false
positives because of unpaired local_bh_disable() reported by Borislav
Petkov [1] and Peter Zijlstra [2], and make bh_lock_map only exist for
PREEMPT_RT]
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <redacted>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250306122413.GBZ8mT7Z61Tmgnh5Y9@fat_crate.local/ (local) [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250307113955.GK16878@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/ (local) [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250118054900.18639-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com (local)
---
kernel/softirq.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 4dae6ac2e83f..3ce136bdcbfe 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c@@ -126,6 +126,18 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct softirq_ctrl, softirq_ctrl) = { .lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(softirq_ctrl.lock), }; +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC +static struct lock_class_key bh_lock_key; +struct lockdep_map bh_lock_map = { + .name = "local_bh", + .key = &bh_lock_key, + .wait_type_outer = LD_WAIT_FREE, + .wait_type_inner = LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* PREEMPT_RT makes BH preemptible. */ + .lock_type = LD_LOCK_PERCPU, +}; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bh_lock_map); +#endif + /** * local_bh_blocked() - Check for idle whether BH processing is blocked *
@@ -148,6 +160,8 @@ void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt) WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq()); + lock_map_acquire_read(&bh_lock_map); + /* First entry of a task into a BH disabled section? */ if (!current->softirq_disable_cnt) { if (preemptible()) {
@@ -211,6 +225,8 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt) WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq()); lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled(); + lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map); + local_irq_save(flags); curcnt = __this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt);
@@ -261,6 +277,8 @@ static inline void ksoftirqd_run_begin(void) /* Counterpart to ksoftirqd_run_begin() */ static inline void ksoftirqd_run_end(void) { + /* pairs with the lock_map_acquire_read() in ksoftirqd_run_begin() */ + lock_map_release(&bh_lock_map); __local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET, true); WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt()); local_irq_enable();
--
2.47.1