Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2025-03-05

Re: [Patch rdma-next] RDMA/mana_ib: handle net event for pointing to the current netdev

From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
Date: 2025-03-04 06:40:02
Also in: linux-hyperv, linux-rdma, lkml

On 2025-03-01 at 04:11:59, longli@linuxonhyperv.com (longli@linuxonhyperv.com) wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>

When running under Hyper-V, the master device to the RDMA device is always
bonded to this RDMA device if it's present in the kernel. This is not
user-configurable.

The master device can be unbind/bind from the kernel. During those events,
the RDMA device should set to the current netdev to relect the change of
master device from those events.

Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/device.c  | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/mana_ib.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/device.c
index 3416a85f8738..3e4f069c2258 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/device.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/device.c
@@ -51,6 +51,37 @@ static const struct ib_device_ops mana_ib_dev_ops = {
 			   ib_ind_table),
 };

+static int mana_ib_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
+				unsigned long event, void *ptr)
+{
+	struct mana_ib_dev *dev = container_of(this, struct mana_ib_dev, nb);
+	struct net_device *event_dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
+	struct gdma_context *gc = dev->gdma_dev->gdma_context;
+	struct mana_context *mc = gc->mana.driver_data;
+	struct net_device *ndev;
+
+	if (event_dev != mc->ports[0])
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	switch (event) {
+	case NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER:
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		ndev = mana_get_primary_netdev_rcu(mc, 0);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
...
+
+		/*
+		 * RDMA core will setup GID based on updated netdev.
+		 * It's not possible to race with the core as rtnl lock is being
+		 * held.
+		 */
+		ib_device_set_netdev(&dev->ib_dev, ndev, 1);
rcu_read_unlock() should be here, right ?
+
+		return NOTIFY_OK;
+	default:
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+	}
+}
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help