On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:20:33 +0900 Akihiko Odaki wrote:

quoted

# 5.90 [+0.00] ok 14 tun_vnet_hash.unclassified
# 5.90 [+0.00] #  RUN           tun_vnet_hash.ipv4 ...
# 6.18 [+0.28] # tun.c:669:ipv4:Expected 0 (0) != tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, sizeof(packet), 0, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_IPv4, 0x6e45d952) (0)
# 15.09 [+8.92] # ipv4: Test failed
# 15.10 [+0.00] #          FAIL  tun_vnet_hash.ipv4
# 15.10 [+0.00] not ok 15 tun_vnet_hash.ipv4
# 15.10 [+0.00] #  RUN           tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4 ...
# 15.36 [+0.26] # tun.c:689:tcpv4:Expected 0 (0) != tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, sizeof(packet), VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_TCPv4, 0xfb63539a) (0)
# 24.76 [+9.40] # tcpv4: Test failed
# 24.76 [+0.00] #          FAIL  tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4
# 24.76 [+0.00] not ok 16 tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4
# 24.77 [+0.00] #  RUN           tun_vnet_hash.udpv4 ...
# 25.05 [+0.28] # tun.c:710:udpv4:Expected 0 (0) != tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, sizeof(packet), VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_UDPv4, 0xfb63539a) (0)
# 32.11 [+7.06] # udpv4: Test failed
# 32.11 [+0.00] #          FAIL  tun_vnet_hash.udpv4
# 32.11 [+0.00] not ok 17 tun_vnet_hash.udpv4  

I cannot reproduce the failure. What commit did you apply this patch 
series on? What architecture did the kernel run on?

x86 inside vng, see this for exact details:
https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style

The tests are run on top of net-next + net (the two networking trees
merged together).