Thread (76 messages) 76 messages, 11 authors, 2025-04-22

RE: [RFC PATCH 00/13] Ultra Ethernet driver introduction

From: Bernard Metzler <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-25 13:22:32
Also in: linux-rdma

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Hefty <redacted>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 10:28 PM
To: Roland Dreier <redacted>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <redacted>; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
shrijeet@enfabrica.net; alex.badea@keysight.com; eric.davis@broadcom.com;
rip.sohan@amd.com; dsahern@kernel.org; Bernard Metzler
[off-list ref]; winston.liu@keysight.com;
dan.mihailescu@keysight.com; Kamal Heib [off-list ref];
parth.v.parikh@keysight.com; Dave Miller [off-list ref];
ian.ziemba@hpe.com; andrew.tauferner@cornelisnetworks.com; welch@hpe.com;
rakhahari.bhunia@keysight.com; kingshuk.mandal@keysight.com; linux-
rdma@vger.kernel.org; kuba@kernel.org; Paolo Abeni [off-list ref]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [RFC PATCH 00/13] Ultra Ethernet driver
introduction
quoted
I think the netlink API and job handling overall is the area where the
most
quoted
discussion is probably required. UE is somewhat novel in elevating the
concept
quoted
of a "job" to a standard object with specific properties that determine
the
quoted
values in packet headers. But I'm open to making "job" a top-level RDMA
object... I guess the idea would be to define an interface for creating a
new
quoted
type of "job FD" with a standard ABI for setting properties?
I view a job as scoped by a network address, versus a system global object.
So, I was looking at a per device scope, though I guess a per port (similar
to a pkey) is also possible.  My reasoning was that a device _may_ need to
allocate some per job resource.  Per device job objects could be configured
to have the same 'job address', for an indirect association.

If I understand UEC's job semantics correctly, then the local scope
of a job may span multiple local ports from multiple local devices.
It would of course translate into device specific reservations.
I considered using an fd to share a job object between processes; however,
sharing was restricted per device.

I believe a job may be associated with other security objects (e.g.
encryption) which may also need per device allocations and state tracking.

- Sean
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help