Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2025-03-19

Re: [RFC PATCH] mac80211: clip ADDBA instead of bailing out

From: James Prestwood <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-19 13:21:56
Also in: linux-wireless

Hi Alexandre,

On 3/19/25 3:58 AM, Alexandre Ferrieux wrote:
When a Linux Wifi{4,5} device talks to a Wifi6 AP, if the AP proposes a Block
Acknowledgement aggregation size (ADDBA) exceeding its expectations, the code in
mac80211 just bails out, rejecting the aggregation. This yields a big
performance penalty on the ack path, which is observable in comparison with
other OSes (Windows and MacOS) which "play smarter" and accept the proposal with
a "clipped" size.
Out of curiosity do you have any performance numbers for this, like 
Linux vs Windows vs MacOS? We ran into a significant performance hit 
after I added multicast RX support on ath10k (after ~30 clients were on 
the same channel). After looking into the pcaps we saw many ADDBA 
failures and ultimately had to disable multicast RX. I want to give this 
patch a try either way, but I was curious if you had any data on 
performance improvements.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
A typical scenario would be:

   AP -> Device : ADDBA_request(size=256)

Current Linux reaction:

   Device -> AP : ADDBA_reply(failure)

Other OSes reaction:

   Device -> AP : ADDBA_reply(size=64)

Note that the IEEE802.11 standard allows for both reactions, but it sounds
really suboptimal to be bailing out instead of clipping. The patch below does
the latter.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ferrieux <redacted>
---
diff --git a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
index f3fbe5a4395e..264dad847842 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
@@ -317,18 +317,20 @@ void __ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session(struct sta_info *sta,
                 max_buf_size = IEEE80211_MAX_AMPDU_BUF_HT;

         /* sanity check for incoming parameters:
-        * check if configuration can support the BA policy
-        * and if buffer size does not exceeds max value */
+        * check if configuration can support the BA policy */
         /* XXX: check own ht delayed BA capability?? */
         if (((ba_policy != 1) &&
-            (!(sta->sta.deflink.ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_DELAY_BA))) ||
-           (buf_size > max_buf_size)) {
-               status = WLAN_STATUS_INVALID_QOS_PARAM;
+            (!(sta->sta.deflink.ht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_DELAY_BA)))) {
+               status = WLAN_STATUS_INVALID_QOS_PARAM;
                 ht_dbg_ratelimited(sta->sdata,
                                    "AddBA Req with bad params from %pM on tid
%u. policy %d, buffer size %d\n",
                                    sta->sta.addr, tid, ba_policy, buf_size);
                 goto end;
         }
+       if (buf_size > max_buf_size) {
+         buf_size = max_buf_size ; // Clip instead of bailing out
+       }
+
         /* determine default buffer size */
         if (buf_size == 0)
                 buf_size = max_buf_size;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help