[PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 01/15] rxrpc: rxperf: Fix missing decoding of terminal magic cookie · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 02/15] rxrpc: peer->mtu_lock is redundant · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 03/15] rxrpc: Fix locking issues with the peer record hash · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 04/15] afs: Fix the server_list to unuse a displaced server rather than putting it · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 05/15] afs: Give an afs_server object a ref on the afs_cell object it points to · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 06/15] afs: Remove the "autocell" mount option · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 07/15] afs: Change dynroot to create contents on demand · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 08/15] afs: Improve afs_volume tracing to display a debug ID · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 09/15] afs: Improve server refcount/active count tracing · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 10/15] afs: Make afs_lookup_cell() take a trace note · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 11/15] afs: Drop the net parameter from afs_unuse_cell() · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 12/15] rxrpc: Allow the app to store private data on peer structs · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 13/15] afs: Use the per-peer app data provided by rxrpc · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 14/15] afs: Fix afs_server ref accounting · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
[PATCH net-next 15/15] afs: Simplify cell record handling · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-24
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records · Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> · 2025-02-27
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-27
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records · Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> · 2025-02-27
Which tree to push afs + crypto + rxrpc spanning patches through? · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-27
Re: Which tree to push afs + crypto + rxrpc spanning patches through? · Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> · 2025-02-28
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records · patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org · 2025-02-27
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2025-02-28
Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2025-02-28

Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] afs, rxrpc: Clean up refcounting on afs_cell and afs_server records

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: 2025-02-27 14:43:39
Also in: lkml

On 2/27/25 2:10 PM, David Howells wrote:

Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The remaining patches in this series touch only AFS, I'm unsure if net-next
if the best target here???

Yeah.  It's tricky as the complete set of patches I would like to post spans
three subsystems.

Possibly sharing a stable tree somewhere, and let the relevant subsystem
pull the tree specific deps/bits could help?

/P

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help