Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/10] net: ti: prueth: Adds ICSSM Ethernet driver
From: Parvathi Pudi <parvathi@couthit.com>
Date: 2025-02-21 12:35:18
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi,
On 2025-02-14 at 11:16:54, parvathi (parvathi@couthit.com) wrote:quoted
From: Roger Quadros <redacted> +static int icssm_prueth_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device_node *eth0_node = NULL, *eth1_node = NULL; + struct device_node *eth_node, *eth_ports_node; + enum pruss_pru_id pruss_id0, pruss_id1; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np; + struct prueth *prueth; + int i, ret; + + np = dev->of_node; + if (!np) + return -ENODEV; /* we don't support non DT */ + + prueth = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*prueth), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!prueth) + return -ENOMEM; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, prueth); + prueth->dev = dev; + prueth->fw_data = device_get_match_data(dev); + + eth_ports_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "ethernet-ports"); + if (!eth_ports_node) + return -ENOENT; + + for_each_child_of_node(eth_ports_node, eth_node) { + u32 reg; + + if (strcmp(eth_node->name, "ethernet-port")) + continue; + ret = of_property_read_u32(eth_node, "reg", ®); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "%pOF error reading port_id %d\n", + eth_node, ret); + } + + of_node_get(eth_node); + + if (reg == 0) { + eth0_node = eth_node; + if (!of_device_is_available(eth0_node)) { + of_node_put(eth0_node); + eth0_node = NULL; + } + } else if (reg == 1) { + eth1_node = eth_node; + if (!of_device_is_available(eth1_node)) { + of_node_put(eth1_node); + eth1_node = NULL; + }It depends on your DT, but is there any chance that more than once, we reach here in else case. { if (of_device_is_availabke(...) } ?
Yes, we will enter here in case of "EPROBE_DEFER".
quoted
+ } else { + dev_err(dev, "port reg should be 0 or 1\n"); + } + } + + of_node_put(eth_ports_node); + + /* At least one node must be present and available else we fail */ + if (!eth0_node && !eth1_node) { + dev_err(dev, "neither port0 nor port1 node available\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + + if (eth0_node == eth1_node) { + dev_err(dev, "port0 and port1 can't have same reg\n"); + of_node_put(eth0_node); + return -ENODEV; + } + + prueth->eth_node[PRUETH_MAC0] = eth0_node; + prueth->eth_node[PRUETH_MAC1] = eth1_node;... +quoted
+ if (eth0_node) { + prueth->pru0 = pru_rproc_get(np, 0, &pruss_id0); + if (IS_ERR(prueth->pru0)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(prueth->pru0); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "unable to get PRU0: %d\n", ret); + goto put_pru; + } + } + + if (eth1_node) { + prueth->pru1 = pru_rproc_get(np, 1, &pruss_id1); + if (IS_ERR(prueth->pru1)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(prueth->pru1); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "unable to get PRU1: %d\n", ret); + goto put_pru; + } + } + + /* setup netdev interfaces */ + if (eth0_node) { + ret = icssm_prueth_netdev_init(prueth, eth0_node); + if (ret) { + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(dev, "netdev init %s failed: %d\n", + eth0_node->name, ret); + } + goto put_pru; + } + } + + if (eth1_node) { + ret = icssm_prueth_netdev_init(prueth, eth1_node); + if (ret) { + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(dev, "netdev init %s failed: %d\n", + eth1_node->name, ret); + } + goto netdev_exit; + } + } + + /* register the network devices */ + if (eth0_node) { + ret = register_netdev(prueth->emac[PRUETH_MAC0]->ndev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "can't register netdev for port MII0"); + goto netdev_exit; + } + + prueth->registered_netdevs[PRUETH_MAC0] = + prueth->emac[PRUETH_MAC0]->ndev; + } + + if (eth1_node) { + ret = register_netdev(prueth->emac[PRUETH_MAC1]->ndev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "can't register netdev for port MII1"); + goto netdev_unregister; + } + + prueth->registered_netdevs[PRUETH_MAC1] = + prueth->emac[PRUETH_MAC1]->ndev; + } + + if (eth1_node) + of_node_put(eth1_node); + if (eth0_node) + of_node_put(eth0_node);nit: A function would be better than code duplication for eth0_node and eth1_node ?
It is due to possibility of using a single node. Thanks and Regards, Parvathi.