On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 15:47, Stefano Garzarella [off-list ref] wrote:

I forgot to mention that IMHO it's better to split this series.
This first patch (this one) seems ready, without controversy, and it's
a real fix, so for me v3 should be a version ready to be merged.

While the other patch is more controversial and especially not a fix
but more of a new feature, so I don't think it makes sense to continue
to have these two patches in a single series.

Thanks,
Stefano

Well, I agree with you that these two patches should be splited.
And I will send v3 version of the first patch individually.

And according to our discussion, the second one can be ignored, until
we find a suitable way to deal the scenario I metionded.

Thanks,
Junnan