On 2/13/25 9:36 AM, Xiao Liang wrote:

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 2:54 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]

quoted

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/if_macvlan.h b/include/linux/if_macvlan.h
index 523025106a64..0f7281e3e448 100644
--- a/include/linux/if_macvlan.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_macvlan.h

@@ -59,8 +59,10 @@ static inline void macvlan_count_rx(const struct macvlan_dev *vlan,

 extern void macvlan_common_setup(struct net_device *dev);

-extern int macvlan_common_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
-                               struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
+struct rtnl_newlink_params;

You can just include <net/rtnetlink.h> and remove it from .c
files, then this forward declaration will be unnecessary.

OK. Was not sure if it's desirable to include include/net files from
include/linux.

I think we are better of with the forward declaration instead of adding
more intra header dependencies, which will slow down the build and will
produces artifacts in the CI runs (increases of reported warning in the
incremental build, as any warns from the included header will be
'propagated' to more files).

quoted

quoted

+extern int macvlan_common_newlink(struct net_device *dev,
+                               struct rtnl_newlink_params *params,
                                struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);

 extern void macvlan_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head);

[...]

quoted

diff --git a/include/net/rtnetlink.h b/include/net/rtnetlink.h
index bc0069a8b6ea..00c086ca0c11 100644
--- a/include/net/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/net/rtnetlink.h

@@ -69,6 +69,42 @@ static inline int rtnl_msg_family(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
              return AF_UNSPEC;
 }

+/**
+ *   struct rtnl_newlink_params - parameters of rtnl_link_ops::newlink()

The '\t' after '*' should be single '\s'.

Same for lines below.

This is copied from other structs in the same file. Should I change it?

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13.2/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst#L376

In this series, just use the good formatting for the new code.

Thanks,

Paolo