在 2025/1/24 23:41, Guenter Roeck 写道:

On 1/24/25 07:08, Andrew Lunn wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:26:26AM +0800, Huisong Li wrote:

quoted

The HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro is provided by hwmon.h and used widely 
by many
other drivers. This series use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify 
code.

Huisong Li (9):
   media: video-i2c: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   net: aquantia: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   net: nfp: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   net: phy: marvell: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   net: phy: marvell10g: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   rtc: ab-eoz9: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   rtc: ds3232: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   w1: w1_therm: w1: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
   net: phy: aquantia: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code

Please split these patches per subsystem. Maintainers generally have
scripts to accept patches, and those scripts don't work when there are
patches for other Maintainers mixed in. So you need 4 patchsets,
media, net, rtc and w1.

I would also like to see the HWMON Maintainers opinion on these. A
patchset containing these have already been NACKed once. These patches
do however look like valid cleanups. But are they just so you can do
something bad in your vendor tree, which will never make it to
mainline?

I no longer comment on hwmon related changes outside drivers/hwmon/
unless there are blatant problems such as someone trying to use an 
obsolete
API or abusing the current API.

All right. Let subsystem maintainer to decide if need to pick it up.

.