Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf

[PATCH v7 0/9] DTS updates for system1 BMC · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 4/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: system1: Add GPIO line name · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf · Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> · 2025-02-03
Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf · Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 6/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: system1: Update LED gpio name · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 9/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: system1: Disable gpio pull down · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 5/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: system1: Reduce sgpio speed · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 3/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: system1: Add IPMB device · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 2/9] dt-bindings: gpio: ast2400-gpio: Add hogs parsing · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
Re: [PATCH v7 2/9] dt-bindings: gpio: ast2400-gpio: Add hogs parsing · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2025-02-13
[PATCH v7 7/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: system1: Remove VRs max8952 · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
[PATCH v7 8/9] ARM: dts: aspeed: system1: Mark GPIO line high/low · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-03
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] DTS updates for system1 BMC · "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org> · 2025-02-03
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] DTS updates for system1 BMC · Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> · 2025-02-04
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] DTS updates for system1 BMC · Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> · 2025-02-04
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] DTS updates for system1 BMC · Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> · 2025-02-05

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-03 16:02:03
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-aspeed, linux-devicetree, lkml

On 03/02/2025 16:17, Ninad Palsule wrote:

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for the review.

quoted

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>

You still need to fix the subject. Why patch #1 has bindings but patch
#2 dt-bindings? Why can't this be consistent?

What is preferred now a days? bindings or dt-bindings?

dt-bindings. nowadays? submitting patches asks for this since 2018.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help