On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 14:51:52 -0600
David Lechner [off-list ref] wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:38 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:

quoted

quoted

So I'm proposing that we add a gpiods_set_array_value_cansleep()
function that is a wrapper around gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep()
that has struct gpio_descs as the first parameter to make it a bit
easier to read the code and avoid the hard-coding temptation.  

 
This looks reasonable.

How do you plan to get it merged, since you cross a lot of subsystems
here.

	Andrew  

Since these are mostly small changes and most of the touched drivers aren't
seeing much action, I think it would be OK for as much as possible to go through
the GPIO tree.

We might need an immutable branch from that though since I know that iio: adc:
ad7606 is currently being actively worked on.

Looks good to me (subject to requested name change from Bartosz)
I'd suggest an immutable with patch 1 then up to each subsystem
maintainer to pick that up or wait for next cycle.

Always hard to predict what else will get worked on at this stage
of a cycle.

Jonathan

If there are any patches leftover that don't get acked to go through the GPIO
tree, I can resubmit them after the next kernel release cycle since none of
this is urgent anyway.