On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:29:45AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Keith Busch wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:32:47AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:

quoted

quoted

@@ -35,10 +35,12 @@ static inline int call_once(struct once *once, int (*cb)(struct once *))
                return 0;
 
         guard(mutex)(&once->lock);
-        WARN_ON(atomic_read(&once->state) == ONCE_RUNNING);
-        if (atomic_read(&once->state) != ONCE_NOT_STARTED)
+        if (WARN_ON(atomic_read(&once->state) == ONCE_RUNNING))
                 return -EINVAL;
 
+        if (atomic_read(&once->state) == ONCE_COMPLETED)
+                return 0;
+
         atomic_set(&once->state, ONCE_RUNNING);
        r = cb(once);
        if (r)

Possible suggestion since it seems odd to do an atomic_read twice on the
same value.

Yeah, good call.  At the risk of getting too cute, how about this?

Sure, that also looks good to me.