Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v1 1/5] net: add devmem TCP TX documentation
From: Stanislav Fomichev <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-28 03:51:17
Also in:
kvm, linux-doc, linux-kselftest, lkml, virtualization
On 01/27, Mina Almasry wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 8:56 PM Stanislav Fomichev [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 12/21, Mina Almasry wrote:quoted
Add documentation outlining the usage and details of the devmem TCP TX API. Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <redacted> --- Documentation/networking/devmem.rst | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devmem.rst b/Documentation/networking/devmem.rst index d95363645331..9be01cd96ee2 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/devmem.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/devmem.rst@@ -62,15 +62,15 @@ More Info https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240831004313.3713467-1-almasrymina@google.com/ -Interface -========= +RX Interface +============ Example ------- -tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c:do_server shows an example of setting up -the RX path of this API. +./tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ncdevmem:do_server shows an example of +setting up the RX path of this API. NIC Setup@@ -235,6 +235,138 @@ can be less than the tokens provided by the user in case of: (a) an internal kernel leak bug. (b) the user passed more than 1024 frags. +TX Interface +============ + + +Example +------- + +./tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/ncdevmem:do_client shows an example of +setting up the TX path of this API. + + +NIC Setup +--------- + +The user must bind a TX dmabuf to a given NIC using the netlink API:: + + struct netdev_bind_tx_req *req = NULL; + struct netdev_bind_tx_rsp *rsp = NULL; + struct ynl_error yerr; + + *ys = ynl_sock_create(&ynl_netdev_family, &yerr); + + req = netdev_bind_tx_req_alloc(); + netdev_bind_tx_req_set_ifindex(req, ifindex); + netdev_bind_tx_req_set_fd(req, dmabuf_fd); + + rsp = netdev_bind_tx(*ys, req); + + tx_dmabuf_id = rsp->id; + + +The netlink API returns a dmabuf_id: a unique ID that refers to this dmabuf +that has been bound. + +The user can unbind the dmabuf from the netdevice by closing the netlink socket +that established the binding. We do this so that the binding is automatically +unbound even if the userspace process crashes. + +Note that any reasonably well-behaved dmabuf from any exporter should work with +devmem TCP, even if the dmabuf is not actually backed by devmem. An example of +this is udmabuf, which wraps user memory (non-devmem) in a dmabuf. + +Socket Setup +------------ + +The user application must use MSG_ZEROCOPY flag when sending devmem TCP. Devmem +cannot be copied by the kernel, so the semantics of the devmem TX are similar +to the semantics of MSG_ZEROCOPY. + + ret = setsockopt(socket_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY, &opt, sizeof(opt)); + +Sending data +-------------- + +Devmem data is sent using the SCM_DEVMEM_DMABUF cmsg. +[...]quoted
+The user should create a msghdr with iov_base set to NULL and iov_len set to the +number of bytes to be sent from the dmabuf.Should we verify that iov_base is NULL in the kernel? But also, alternatively, why not go with iov_base == offset? This way we can support several offsets in a single message, just like regular sendmsg with host memory. Any reason to not do that?Sorry for the late reply. Some of these suggestions took a bit to investigate and other priorities pulled me a bit from this. I've prototyped using iov_base as offset with some help from your published branch, and it works fine. It seems to me a big improvement to the UAPI. Will reupload RFC v2 while the tree is closed with this change.
Great, thanks for the update, looking forward!