Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] vhost_scsi: Add check for inherit_owner status
From: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Date: 2025-01-22 20:19:06
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
From: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Date: 2025-01-22 20:19:06
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On 12/30/24 6:43 AM, Cindy Lu wrote:
The vhost_scsi VHOST_NEW_WORKER requires the inherit_owner setting to be true. So we need to implement a check for this. Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <redacted> --- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c index 718fa4e0b31e..0d63b6b5c852 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c@@ -2086,6 +2086,14 @@ vhost_scsi_ioctl(struct file *f, return -EFAULT; return vhost_scsi_set_features(vs, features); case VHOST_NEW_WORKER: + /* + * vhost_tasks will account for worker threads under the parent's + * NPROC value but kthreads do not. To avoid userspace overflowing + * the system with worker threads inherit_owner must be true. + */ + if (!vs->dev.inherit_owner)> + return -EFAULT;
Why did you keep this here? I had mentioned it belonged in the common code: https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/3864ae3b-d6cd-4227-b4bb-56e014c71667@oracle.com/T/#u (local) because the limitation applies to all drivers. I didn't see a reply about it but saw you did fix up the comment. Not sure if I missed it or there was a technical issue you hit.
+ fallthrough; case VHOST_FREE_WORKER: case VHOST_ATTACH_VRING_WORKER: case VHOST_GET_VRING_WORKER: