Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: phy: Fix suspicious rcu_dereference usage
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Date: 2025-01-21 10:29:50
Also in:
lkml
Hi, Kory, On 21.01.2025 11:38, Kory Maincent wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 11:12:28 -0800 Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:19:25 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote:quoted
The path reported to not having RTNL lock acquired is the suspend path of the ravb MAC driver. Without this fix we got this warning:I maintain that ravb is buggy, plenty of drivers take rtnl_lock from the .suspend callback. We need _some_ write protection here, the patch as is only silences a legitimate warning.Indeed if the suspend path is buggy we should fix it. Still there is lots of ethernet drivers calling phy_disconnect without rtnl (IIUC) if probe return an error or in the remove path. What should we do about it? About ravb suspend, I don't have the board, Claudiu could you try this instead of the current fix:diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.cb/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index bc395294a32d..c9a0d2d6f371 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c@@ -3215,15 +3215,22 @@ static int ravb_suspend(struct device *dev) if (!netif_running(ndev)) goto reset_assert; + rtnl_lock(); netif_device_detach(ndev); - if (priv->wol_enabled) - return ravb_wol_setup(ndev); + if (priv->wol_enabled) { + ret = ravb_wol_setup(ndev); + rtnl_unlock(); + return ret; + } ret = ravb_close(ndev); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + rtnl_unlock(); return ret; + } + rtnl_unlock(); ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(&priv->pdev->dev); if (ret) return ret;
The warning is gone with this, as well. Thank you, Claudiu
Regards,