Thread (71 messages) flat view 71 messages, 3 authors, 2025-02-07

Re: [PATCH net-next v18 12/25] ovpn: implement TCP transport

From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>
Date: 2025-01-20 14:11:33
Also in: linux-kselftest, lkml

On 17/01/2025 18:14, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
2025-01-13, 10:31:31 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
quoted
+static int ovpn_tcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
+			    int flags, int *addr_len)
+{
+	int err = 0, off, copied = 0, ret;
+	struct ovpn_socket *sock;
+	struct ovpn_peer *peer;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	sock = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
+	if (!sock || !sock->peer) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		return -EBADF;
+	}
+	/* we take a reference to the peer linked to this TCP socket, because
+	 * in turn the peer holds a reference to the socket itself.
Going back now to this specific comment:
Not anymore since v12? [*]

I think it's ok here because we're only using peer and sk (not
anything from ovpn_socket), but it is relevant in _sendmsg, which has
the same peer_hold pattern without this comment.
After applying to _sendmsg() the modifications you suggested (i.e. 
reference peer directly instead of sock->peer), it also only uses peer 
and sk, but not ovpn_socket.
Therefore it should be fine too.

This said, the comment above should go away or at least should be modified.
[*]
v11:
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241029-b4-ovpn-v11-8-de4698c73a25@openvpn.net/ (local)
    ovpn_peer_release -> ovpn_socket_put

v12:
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241202-b4-ovpn-v12-9-239ff733bf97@openvpn.net/ (local)
    ovpn_peer_release doesn't do ovpn_socket_put

  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241202-b4-ovpn-v12-7-239ff733bf97@openvpn.net/ (local)
    ovpn_socket_put is done directly at ovpn_peer_remove time, before the final peer_put
Right - the lifetime of ovpn_socket is not tied to ovpn_peer anymore.
However, with the current code I don't think we ever assume that.


Regards,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli
OpenVPN Inc.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help